Dear Sen4CAP team,
I have produced some harvest results, but have some questions in regards of interpretation of them.
Before seeing the results and from what I have understood, in order the parcel to be confirmed with the harvest, all the 5 markers needed to be set to be TRUE. As I am seeing from the results, this is not the case. So I guess I misunderstood that. The column in the results file H_week is presenting the harvest week, the following two – H_W_START and H_W_END – the start and the end of the harvest and the H_W_S1 - the harvest week, predicted with S1 data. Am I correct?
There are quite many parcels , where H_W_S1 is not falling into the week of predicted harvest – stated in the H_week column. Should I understand in these cases that the decision for the harvest was made on the Sentinel-2 markers then?
I have it hard to see a pattern here in general in regards of the decision if the parcel was harvested or not. There are a bunch of parcels, which are marked as “NO-HARVEST” in both H_WEEK and H_W_S1 columns and only Marker 1 is set to be TRUE. This seems quite intuitive for me. But there is also another bunch of parcels, which are assigned with a date in the column H_W_S1 and are marked as not harvested (again only Marker 1 is set to be as TRUE). Why is it so?
Could you, please, expand a bit on how should I interpret the previously mentioned columns with the results?